China reaffirms claim on Arunachal, calls McMahon Line illegal

by Team FNVA
A+A-
Reset

First Post
May 25, 2015

Sticking to its stand that McMahon Line on India-China boundary is “illegal”, China on Monday said it was ready to work with India to resolve the vexed border issue at an early date through “friendly consultations” to create more favourable conditions for bilateral ties.

“The Chinese side holds a consistent and clear position on the eastern section of the China-India boundary,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said, reaffirming Beijing’s claims on Arunachal Pradesh, which it says is a part of ‘Southern Tibet’.

“The Chinese government does not recognise ‘the McMahon Line’, which is illegal,” she said, reacting to National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval’s remarks made at the K F
Rustamji lecture in New Delhi recently.

Indian soldiers patrol the Line of Actual Control (LAC), in Bumla in Arunachal Pradesh. About 38,000 sq. km of Indian territory is under Chinese occupation in Jammu and Kashmir.

Indian soldiers patrol the Line of Actual Control (LAC), in Bumla in Arunachal Pradesh. About 38,000 sq. km of Indian territory is under Chinese occupation in Jammu and Kashmir.

“The Chinese side is ready to work with the Indian side to resolve the boundary question through friendly consultation at an early date and create more favourable conditions for the development of the bilateral relations,” she said in a written response to a PTI query.

In his address on 22 May, Doval said settlement of the border issue is “critical” for India-China ties and called for a “larger plan” for “tackling” that country to resolve all ticklish matters.

Doval, also the Special Representative of the Sino-India boundary talks, said while ties with China are looking up, “we are particularly concerned about the Eastern sector where the claims have been made on Tawang (in Arunachal Pradesh) which is totally in contravention of accepted principles”.

He also expressed surprise that while McMahon Line was agreed till Burma (Myanmar) by China, it was not accepted beyond it.

The line that was agreed to by Britain and Tibet as part of the 1914 Simla Accord is named after Sir Henry McMahon, foreign secretary of the British-run Government of India and the chief negotiator of settling disputes with China.

“We have got a very long border, we have got 3,488-km long border, a very difficult and mountainous terrain snow-clad… now for the bilateral relations with China, border is
the critical and vital issue,” Doval said.

In a guarded response, Hua skirted Doval’s assertion that China recognised the McMahon Line in the case of Burma but not when it came to the Indian border.

She said “it is not easy to resolve the China-India boundary question, as it is an issue left over from history”.

The 18 rounds of Special Representative talks between India-China so far to resolve the dispute “made important progress, laying a solid foundation for the continuous and steady growth of China-India relations”, she said.

“During Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent visit to China, the two sides reaffirmed their commitment to a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution to the boundary question by pressing ahead with the process of the special representatives’ meeting,” Hua said.

Copyright @2019 – 2023  All Right Reserved |  Foundation for Non-violent Alternatives