Peter Neill
The Huffington Post
May 19, 2015
Himalayan landscape
One of the greatest expressions of engineering hubris has been the construction of dams to transform the energy of free-flowing rivers into massive reservoirs of water for controlled release and hydro-generated energy. In the United States, in Egypt, India, and China, enormous dams in remote places have become symbols of national pride and emerging economy, designed to bring energy to distant cities and growing urban populations and industrial enterprise.
The construction of these dams required equally enormous investment of capital and labor, financed, supervised, and subsequently managed primarily by central governments or their specially designated authorities. In 1957, the historian Karl Wittvogel published Oriental Despotism, a survey of the reliance of ancient society on the control of water, examples again in the Middle East, India, and China of similar engineering projects where dams, reservoirs, canals, and distribution systems facilitated the growth and sustenance of sustainable societies on a scale far greater and more successful as a result of abundant water and its provenance. Such projects could only be managed by a power great enough to command the financial resources and the slave labor required to build such cities. To construct modern dams requires equally authoritative regimes, either by legislative decree or dictatorial fiat. The Aswan Dam in Egypt, the engineered river linkage projects in India, and the Three Gorges Dam and north/south canal water transport systems in China are all examples of a similar pattern: central government, unlimited finance, cheap labor, and no fear of opposition or consequence of the environmental damage, social dislocation, and cultural destruction that follows.
Nepal was recently devastated by a major earthquake that left many thousands dead, many more thousands missing, and the country bereft of resources to respond or to restore what was their simple modicum of life.
Isabel Hilton in an excellent report entitled “Nepal’s Dangerous Dams” for The New Yorker magazine reveals a chilling sidebar to the larger earthquake story, the rescue by helicopter of 280 Chinese workers from the construction site of the hydropower dam on the Tishuli River, some 86 miles from Kathmandu, and 40 miles from the epicenter. The 350 Nepali workers were left to fend for themselves. According to the Three Gorges Corporation, the construction company owned by the Chinese government, the dam was “severely damaged.”
“The Rasuwaghadi Dam,” reports Ms. Hilton, “is one of three contracts won in the area by the Three Gorges Corporation, and one of thirteen planned along this stretch of the river. The company, which has been repeatedly implicated in corruption in China, has also won the contract to build the controversial 750 megawatt West Seti dam, which, at US$1.6 billion, will be Nepal’s biggest ever foreign investment.”
What does it mean that Rasuwaghadi was “severely damaged?” What would be the catastrophic downstream destruction if an aftershock or larger quake caused the dam to collapse? Here is the most disturbing paragraph in Ms. Hilton’s report:
“Geologists argue that the risks of building dams in earthquake zones go well beyond an earthquake-induced collapse…But the most fiercely debated risk, since the 7.9-magnitude Sichuan earthquake in 2008, which killed 70,000 people and left nearly 20,000 missing, is that of ‘reservoir-induced seismicity’ – the theory that the weight of water behind a dam, coupled with the seeping of water into the fissures in rocks below, can produce shearing stress strong enough to worsen, or trigger an earthquake.”
What I think this suggests is that the first tremor can create further tremors within the water reserve and the underlying geology so as to amplify the quake into reverberation increasing the probability of collapse.
Yes, Nepal needs this energy for its own security, development, and financial stability. But what is really being wrought here? These mega-projects (and there are many more of them) are fed mostly by glacial melt, a phenomenon put in question by the already evident effect of global warming on the glacier as source. Thus, these dams may be over-engineered for a future inadequate supply or under-engineered for the risk of an earthquake zone.
Water is power, physical and political, with inherent force not always acquiescent to our ambitions and prideful dreams. We attempt to master it at our peril.
