Dai was quoted as having said, “If the Indian side takes care of China’s concerns in the eastern sector of their border, the Chinese side will respond accordingly and address India’s concerns elsewhere… China and India are now standing in front of the gate towards a final settlement. The gate is a framework solution based on meaningful and mutually accepted adjustments. Now, the Indian side holds the key to the gate.”
Which is all well and good for China. After all, Beijing refers to the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh as South Tibet, claiming it to be “inalienable from China’s Tibet in terms of cultural background and administrative jurisdiction”. Speaking of this cultural background aspect, it is believed that control of Tawang will tighten China’s grip on Tibetan Buddhism.
There are a number of reasons India has rejected this offer in the past and is likely to continue to do so in the future for the following reasons:
First, there’s a problem of nomenclature. To India, Tawang refers to a small town in Arunachal Pradesh. Just what China means by the ‘Tawang Tract’ is as-yet-unknown to India. It could mean the town or it could mean the entirety of Arunachal Pradesh.
Second, there’s the strategic importance of the disputed area. Control of Tawang would give China the ability to cut India’s North East from the rest of the country.
Third, there’s the Bhutan factor. Thimphu has no diplomatic relations with Beijing, and remains one of New Delhi’s closest partners in the region. Control of Tawang would give China the ability to flank Bhutan from the East, and allow it to put pressure on the country.
Fourth, there’s the message that would go out to Pakistan. Seeing India cede territory to China would send Islamabad the message that New Delhi is in the mood to hand out swathes of land. And this will lead to more trouble in Kashmir.
It is primarily for these reasons that India is unlikely to take China up on this idea.
